We’ve moved!

You will be redirected to our new home in five seconds. If not, click here.

GigaOM Network: GigaOM | Earth2Tech | jkOnTheRun | NewTeeVee | OStatic | TheAppleBlog | WebWorkerDaily | Jobs Live Events | About | Contact

November 03, 2006

Friday's question: why does an iTunes upgrade need a full install?

Itunes_7_2

I don't know why I never thought to ask this question before, and I'm sure it's been asked somewhere before but: when there's a new Apple iTunes version available, why does it require a full download of iTunes? Seriously. This is a "point" upgrade, meaning today I'm going from iTunes 7.0.1 to 7.0.2 and there are some very minor fixes or updates and no major new functionality expected. Being the good little iTuner that I am, I of course click Yes only to be greeted by this:

Itunes_35_mb

Somebody help me understand how 35 MB are required for a minor upgrade...actually, you won't ever succeed because the "upgrade" isn't an upgrade at all. It's a full download and reinstall over your old client so that it can preserve your personal settings.

"What's the big deal?" you ask. Good question, because on the surface, it's not a big deal. In fact, it's not a big deal to me at this given time either, simply because I'm at my home office. What if I was using Sammy on the road today, however? If you're on the road with a mobile computing device and you got the screens above, how convenient is it to download 35 MB over a wireless connection? I realize not everyone has 3G at this point, so if you were on a wireless 1xRTT connection, you'd likely skip this "upgrade" and put it off until you got home.

I suppose this truly isn't a big deal; after all: if you're truly mobile most of the time, you likely have the connectivity and unlimited data plan you need to download this or anything else you need within a reasonable time-frame. Perhaps this bothers me because it's a sloppy way to upgrade a client, especially a mobile client that has to waste time and wireless bandwidth to re-download something they already have 99% of in the first place. 

Enjoy this post? Receive more jkOnTheRun content for FREE by subscribing to the RSS feed!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b75769e200d834c21a3153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Friday's question: why does an iTunes upgrade need a full install?:

Comments

I suspect, depending on your perspective, it's either laziness or expediency -- or maybe both. Rather than create a patch for one set of folks and a complete install for another set of folks (yes, there are still a few of us who don't use iTunes...yet), it's probably easier and faster (for Apple, of course, not necessarily for end users) to create a one-size-fits-all solution.

Also, it could be that they're trying to break some of the FairPlay-defeating programs out there, which makes this "patch" not really patch-size anymore.

Comments are temporarily disabled for site maintenance and will return at 6 PM PDT.

 

RSS and Mobile-Friendly View

Contributors

Kevin C. Tofel

James Kendrick

Kevin's gear   JK's gear

Awards

Microsoft MVP Awardees

CNET100 2004Weblog Awards
2004ReadersChoice 2004_BoardOfExperts
Powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2004

Copyright Notice


  • Copyright 2008 The GigaOM Network. All rights reserved. The content in this RSS feed, as well as the content presented on the web pages of the blog, is provided for your personal non-commercial use only and may not be republished in whole or in part without the express written or verbal consent of the publisher. All rights are reserved.
StatCounter