We’ve moved!

You will be redirected to our new home in five seconds. If not, click here.

GigaOM Network: GigaOM | Earth2Tech | jkOnTheRun | NewTeeVee | OStatic | TheAppleBlog | WebWorkerDaily | Jobs Live Events | About | Contact

September 27, 2006

Intel Ruby UMPC grows up

Intel UMPC 1Intel was demonstrating the Ruby UMPC prototype even before the launch of the Origami devices and if a demonstration yesterday at the Intel Developer’s Forum is any indication the Ruby has certainly grown up.  The new prototype UMPC demonstrated by Paul Otellini and friends has an innovative swivel keyboard, integrated WiFi and WiMAX, and can pair wirelessly with a vehicle for seamless navigation and controlling the audio system of the car.  CNET has posted a 4 minute video of the new device and if you are interested in seeing where the UMPC platform can go you do not want to miss this video.

Intel UMPC 2

Intel UMPC 3

(CNET video via jkOTR reader Kun Kim)

Enjoy this post? Receive more jkOnTheRun content for FREE by subscribing to the RSS feed!

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b75769e200d83461172c69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Intel Ruby UMPC grows up:

Comments

It was a surprise to see the video and instead of clicking the UMPC into a dock in the car they had the UMPC communicate with a second computer already in a car. I can understand why Intel and VW want to sell you two computers, but I think the consumer wants one computer that docks in a car or at a desk.

A navigation computer does not need anything from the car other than a power cord. The argument for tying a computer to a car is a business one with little technical rationale. In the pre-UMPC era, tying a computer to a car was the most common approach but the long run winner is the mobility approach in which the UMPC can undock and come out of the car.

With navigation systems costing much more than UMPCs, it is hard to imagine the UMPC approach losing except out of concerns about theft when the UMPC is left in the car.

I think built-in navigation computers are much more likely to be accepted by average America than UMPCs, regardless of which is the better technical solution, partially for simplicity, partially because the cost of the device would be just part of a much larger purchase instead of standalone.

Comments are temporarily disabled for site maintenance and will return at 6 PM PDT.

 

RSS and Mobile-Friendly View

Contributors

Kevin C. Tofel

James Kendrick

Kevin's gear   JK's gear

Awards

Microsoft MVP Awardees

CNET100 2004Weblog Awards
2004ReadersChoice 2004_BoardOfExperts
Powered by TypePad
Member since 05/2004

Copyright Notice


  • Copyright 2008 The GigaOM Network. All rights reserved. The content in this RSS feed, as well as the content presented on the web pages of the blog, is provided for your personal non-commercial use only and may not be republished in whole or in part without the express written or verbal consent of the publisher. All rights are reserved.
StatCounter